<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When it is time to reset dirty flag &#8220;invalidatePropertiesFlag&#8221; in Flex invalidation framework?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/2009/12/when-it-is-time-to-reset-dirty-flag-invalidatepropertiesflag-in-flex-invalidation-framework/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/2009/12/when-it-is-time-to-reset-dirty-flag-invalidatepropertiesflag-in-flex-invalidation-framework/</link>
	<description>it's RIA, not Rio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 06:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JabbyPanda</title>
		<link>http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/2009/12/when-it-is-time-to-reset-dirty-flag-invalidatepropertiesflag-in-flex-invalidation-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-64918</link>
		<dc:creator>JabbyPanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 09:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/?p=54#comment-64918</guid>
		<description>The highly relevant discussion on this matter 

http://www.tikalk.com/flex/invalidate-calls-within-commitproperties 

The latest comment under this discussion is suggesting to do exactly the same with processing multiple invalidated properties during the single validation process what you&#039;ve been already doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The highly relevant discussion on this matter </p>
<p><a href="http://www.tikalk.com/flex/invalidate-calls-within-commitproperties" rel="nofollow">http://www.tikalk.com/flex/invalidate-calls-within-commitproperties</a> </p>
<p>The latest comment under this discussion is suggesting to do exactly the same with processing multiple invalidated properties during the single validation process what you&#8217;ve been already doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roman Protsiuk</title>
		<link>http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/2009/12/when-it-is-time-to-reset-dirty-flag-invalidatepropertiesflag-in-flex-invalidation-framework/comment-page-1/#comment-64903</link>
		<dc:creator>Roman Protsiuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/?p=54#comment-64903</guid>
		<description>When it&#039;s possible I always try to process properties that can invalidate other properties first, and those others second.
If it&#039;s impossible another approach would be invoking invalidateProperties via callLater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it&#8217;s possible I always try to process properties that can invalidate other properties first, and those others second.<br />
If it&#8217;s impossible another approach would be invoking invalidateProperties via callLater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

