<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>JabbyPanda’s travel to RIA world &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog</link>
	<description>it's RIA, not Rio</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 22:53:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Should my Flex 4 AutoComplete to be renamed as InputAssist?</title>
		<link>http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/2010/08/should-my-flex-4-autocomplete-to-be-renamed-as-inputassist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/2010/08/should-my-flex-4-autocomplete-to-be-renamed-as-inputassist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JabbyPanda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[InputAssist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/?p=148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am currently in a process of updating the code for the component previously known as "Flex 4 AutoComplete component with text highlighting". This process get me a chance to think a little bit about component branding. What I've recently had learned that AutoComplete is a very common name for the component with such a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>   I am currently in a process of updating the code for the component previously known as <a href="http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/?p=110">"Flex 4 AutoComplete component with text highlighting"</a>.</p>
<p>   This process get me a chance to think a little bit about component branding.</p>
<p>   What I've recently had learned that <em>AutoComplete</em> is a very common name for the component with such a functionality. </p>
<p>     I know, at least, 4 different Flash platform contenders, all of them use "<em>AutoComplete</em>" word in its name:</p>
<ol>
<li> com.adobe.flex.extras.controls.AutoComplete control written for Flex 2;</li>
<li> Flextras commercial component <a href="http://www.flextras.com/?event=ProductHome&amp;productID=10">AutoCompleteComboBox</a>;</li>
<li>Hillel Coren's <a href="http://hillelcoren.com/flex-autocomplete/">AutoComplete </a> control; </li>
<li>And the last, but not least, the  Flex 4 AutoComplete component written by Tenger Ivan.</li>
</ol>
<p>      While <strong>"AutoComplete"</strong> is a very strong brand and it is well known to the end users, I'd like to bring into  Flex components naming world more creativity.</p>
<p>   What if I will rename <em>AutoComplete</em> control to <em>InputAssist</em>? You see, my component not only "auto-completes", it is also providing an helping hand to faster select the value in need from the list of options.</p>
<p>    So, in general, what do you think of <em>InputAssist</em> name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.jabbypanda.com/blog/2010/08/should-my-flex-4-autocomplete-to-be-renamed-as-inputassist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

